National Institute for Health Research logo

CRN West London

The delivery and support teams from the Clinical Research Network in North West London set up EDGE for a complex primary care study. Managing the study brought on some complex and challenging situations in terms of project management, where communication, organisation and team work became key to the success. This has been helped significantly by the use of EDGE. In the early stages, large amounts of information about the study was kept in a number of places that were not so easy to access and were becoming difficult to manage by the team as a whole. 

Since then, they haven’t looked back. Once the process of uploading all the information to EDGE had taken place, they found the system straightforward to access and the layout easy to navigate. The team are able to effortlessly store different pieces of information about the project or primary care sites in one place that everyone can see. For example, they can easily find a particular recruiting site in a couple of clicks and can access information on how many patients were contacted from a particular site and on what date, when screening clinics are running and how many participants have been recruited so far. The outcome is that everyone is able to look at and maintain up-to-date information about the study from a single place from almost any location at any time.

Randeep says “Knowing that I can add users and have the contact details of any member of staff from any of the 50+ GP practices taking part is reassuring and allows a smooth stream of communication with everyone involved. Personally, the “notes” section is a highlight for me, as being able to communicate updates about an individual site for everyone to see in a free-text box saves time on administration and permits flexibility depending on what information can be stored here. Although it is not necessary to upload patient information to EDGE for our team, I have found using anonymous codes for each patient recruited at GP practices has been a safe and fool-proof way for me to keep an accurate record of how many participants are engaged with the study. Last, but certainly not least, the ‘project attribute reports’ have been wonderful when requiring a snapshot of the study for team meetings and to assess data quality”.

This hasn’t just been useful for Randeep, but the whole delivery team have found it a great way to pull off information from EDGE when it comes to arranging financial payments or tracking recruitment. This study was the first they have tried to store financial information on and while this is work in progress, it has been very useful for them so far. In this way, the whole team can be singing from the same hymn sheet without the need for endless spreadsheets and hard-to-follow email trails.

United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust logo
The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust

United Lincolnshire Hospitals Trust

The Lincolnshire Clinical Research Facility facilitates the implementation and management of clinical research for the United Lincolnshire Hospitals Trust across its multiple hospital sites within the large rural county of Lincolnshire in the East Midlands. The research undertaken within the trust encompasses a wide range of therapeutic areas including oncology, haematology, stroke, cardiology, paediatric, dermatology, diabetes, midwifery, ophthalmology, respiratory, anaesthesia, gastroenterology, renal and orthopaedics. The breadth of research disciplines managed by the research facility and the diversity of hospital sites within the trust called for a flexible clinical trials management system to support its continued growth and build upon operational processes. In April 2016 ULHT implemented EDGE across all of its sites providing a fully-integrated data platform for the benefit of clinicians, research nurses, radiologists, pharmacists and other research professionals, supporting their clinical research and providing real-time trial data and business intelligence.

The nature of research in the region is influenced by the diverse needs of a population and healthcare system in the large rural county of Lincolnshire, and Lincoln as one of the fastest growing cities in the UK. The trust needed a system to provide the flexibility to manage differing scales of operations and the requirements of individual units within its organisation but maximise communication, and provide consistent metrics and reporting. One of EDGE’s greatest qualities is its adaptability which makes it so flexible in managing the complexities of clinical trials and the range of contexts in which they are conducted. 

EDGE is an application which is logical and scalable. During the implementation of the CTMS within the organisation we were able to train and roll out the application around the busy work schedules of the research teams and do this in a stepped process by site. The software is user-friendly yet provides powerful functionality and the option to adapt the application, at multiple levels, to meet the needs of the organisation. A core strength of the system is its flexibility for end-user process adaption, allowing individuals and trusts to creatively develop their particular instance. This in turn contributes to the evolution of EDGE through the perspective of sites and researchers who understand evolving operational needs the most and builds benefits for the EDGE community. The developers have cleverly, through the provision of an attribute based system, created an application which is future-proofed and keeps pace with evolving processes. We can build on the global knowledge of users across the UK and beyond in how we can better use data and systems in the delivery of efficient clinical trials. The role out of the system within our Trust has also provided the unanticipated yet immeasurable benefit of engagement with the wider community of EDGE users in delivering research and in sharing best practices, both in terms of the application itself and sharing research ideas in general. 

Within the United Lincolnshire Hospitals Trust we use EDGE to support the setup, feasibility and approval process for studies, track recruitment, manage patient visits, record resource, interventions and inter-disciplinary departmental involvement such as logging studies requiring ECGs, RECIST criteria, all blood sciences requirements etc. We also use EDGE for substantive reporting and monitoring of metrics by maximising the use of core EDGE reports alongside bespoke attribute reporting at a study level, site level and patient level. We are also seeking to develop the system as a trial evaluation tool and workforce management application. 

EDGE has provided ULHT with an IT platform to support its strategic planning and growth, enhancing its reporting, communication and trial management to support enhanced participant engagement and patient outcomes. All this supports the delivery of efficient clinical trials. The following principles demonstrate the benefit of EDGE for individuals, trusts, networks and the NHS.  

EDGE provides; 

1. Complete flexibility to support specific needs of trusts, sites and individuals in managing clinical trials.
2. Creative power for trusts and sites to develop their own instances to meet local needs.
3. an EDGE community who collaborate to collectively evolve the system.
4. a system which is developed through the perspective of the end users who understand their individual needs the most.
5. a robust and secure integrated system and data set for enhancing operational delivery at trust, regional and national levels.
6. a platform for the NHS and international organisations to strategically develop efficient research operations keeping pace with the evolving clinical research landscape.

The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust

The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust (CCC) is pioneering a totally new approach to the care of people with serious illnesses as the UK leader of a national pilot from September 2016 in partnership with Dr Atul Gawande’s Ariadne Labs in Boston, USA and The Marie Curie Palliative Care Institute Liverpool. The Serious Illness Care Programme UK (the Programme) involves meaningful conversations between clinician and patient to identify what matters most to the patient, their goals and their priorities, as they look ahead to treatment and care. The conversations are carefully structured and documented, making sure they take place at the right time and in the right place for each patient.

Our aim is to put data capture systems in place to ensure that the implementation of the Programme can be measured and evaluated accurately whilst ensuring patient safety.

NHS England provided funding for CCC to implement the Programme across three very different sites in the UK, at CCC and primary care GP practices across Airedale in Yorkshire and Southend in Essex.  It was essential that there was robust infrastructure in place to provide not only good governance and oversight but also accurate reporting on agreed outcome metrics. We needed to map activity and progress as part of the monitoring and evaluation process for stakeholders.  As we only had a year for implementation and reporting, it was essential that an easy to use, electronic system that was flexible, allowed anonymisation of participants, was access protected, auditable and quick to build and test, that was accessible for the Data Managers across the disparate sites.  We set our user specific requirements and it was obvious that Edge provided the solution.

The solution that we chose was to expand the use of our Edge platform.  CCC was one of the first Trusts to use Edge for recruitment reporting.  We expanded our use of Edge as a filestore for our studies and used the project attributes and workflows bespoke to our needs as our main governance system, both as Participating Site and Sponsor. Therefore Edge was the natural choice for our Programme infrastructure.  We used the patients tab (and patient flows) to flex for our requirements.  The tabs already set up were perfect for adding the alphanumeric patient codes (letters to ID the site, numbers as a patient count); this was completed by site Data Managers so the Programme staff could never identify the patients receiving the conversation.  We could add the ‘patient screened’ date tab to record the date the patient was reviewed at site as potential beneficiary of the conversation.

We could then begin building in the attributes in order to enter the data needed for our outcome reports and analysis. Attributes were built to map the patient demographics, and coded for the Programme so that it was simple to pull data when setting up queries for reporting. We then built a other sets of attributes to report on the actual activity; the GPs and Clinicians who had the conversations with the patients and the record of such within Edge. Once the attributes were built, we used the Edge infrastructure for our reporting requirements. 

Once in the patient tab we could see the patient code, by clicking on ‘anonymous’ rather than name (as the information was anonymised to the Implementation Team)  we could select the attributes tab, then the usual ‘add entities’.  Our three reporting entities could then be added, namely: Anonymised demographics, Patient screening and evaluation record and the Patient evaluation report. This enabled the following critical outputs to easily be determined:

  • Date patient screened
  • Patient deemed as appropriate to benefit from the Programme
  • Date patient approached
  • Date patient and Clinician had the Programme conversation
  • Number of initial conversations taking place per patients per Clinician per Site
  • Number of follow-up conversations taking place per patient per Clinician per Site
  • Number of conversations per patient screened per site
  • Entry of information into the Practice/ Hospital electronic medical records
  • Number of patients consented to take part in the Patient evaluation per Clinician per Site
  • Uptake of the survey by the patients
  • Evaluation of the Patient Experience

We could monitor and evaluate progress in real time to determine both individual clinician uptake, activity and that of the site in total and the number of conversations that patients had, either as raw data or as per those at site or drilled down to each clinician at site.  This could allow the Implementation Team to provide coaching and support tailored to each site need.   

The implementation of the Serious Illness Care Programme has been a novel and exciting service for patient benefit.  The crucial infrastructure provided by the flexible and auditable Edge system has enhanced and enabled critical analysis, monitoring and evaluation of the Programme, providing essential information on the implementation for improvement and sustainability.